(Text
kindly supplied by Amy de Gruchy) Publication1867,
published by Macmillan ContentsThe
story is of a seventeenth-century marriage
as revealed in letters and other documents
in the possession of Sir Bernard Danvers,
a contemporary Irish baronet. He is visited
by distant relatives from America and together
they learn the causes of the separation of
the two branches of their family. These
spring from the arranged marriage of Lady
Penelope and Sir Thomas Danvers. At home he
is a boorish Somerset baronet, in London a
roistering Restoration gallant. She is plain,
prim and pious. They are further divided by
religion and politics. He is a High Churchman,
and loyal follower of the Stuarts. She is
a Puritan, and opposed to the Stuart kings. However
political events finally reconcile them. Her
support for the Monmouth Rising endangers
not only herself but her husband's tenantry.
To save her and them he pays ruinous bribes
and fines, and takes her to her Irish estate,
where a few years later he is saved by her
Irish tenants after the battle of the Boyne.
By this time the couple have come to love
and respect each other. He lays aside his
wild habits and she, her self-righteousness.
They leave their eldest son to inherit the
Irish estate and make a new home for themselves
in Virginia. It is the descendants of their
younger children who visit Sir Bernard. The
seventeenth-century characters are well-drawn,
but the contemporary figures are shadowy.
The Danvers family history fits well into
actual seventeenth-century events, although
the fictitious dating for the family goes
astray at times. There is a lively picture
of life under the late Stuarts, and the imitation
of the style of writing of the period is well
maintained. The moral teaching is chiefly
aimed at Lady Penelope, whose coldness and
rigidity drive her husband further into vice. Further
ReadingFor contemporary
reviews see L. Madden, J.B. Shorthouse
and C.M. Yonge, unpublished thesis, University
of London Diploma in Librarianship, 1964.
The Danvers Papers:
an Invention
was reviewed in 1867 in The Athenaeum
by Geraldine Endsor Jewsbury. Reference
: 2072 (July 13,1867), 44
|